Why I hope Hillary runs

 I hope Hillary runs. Most people think she’ll win. She’ll lose badly. Why? America will see she is a radical, pro jihadist, dumb dumb candidate.

-Her book sold almost no copies

-she keeps saying unbelievably stupid things including

 “businesses don’t create jobs” so idiot Hillary, who does?

-Regarding whether benghazi was an organized Muslim terror operation she said “at this point what difference does it make” Really you idiot. It does not matter if it was a terrorist event or not that killed our ambassador?

-when asked what her accomplishments were as Secretary of State, she could not think of one.

-They have $100 million dollars and she was saying for weeks how broke they were.

-Her book calls Israel Apartheid state.

Americans will catch on that she was trained by the same ultra radical Saul Alinksy as Obama was and she similarly has an affinity for Muslim Brotherhood terrorits ties.

We all know Obama won only because of racism. People voted for him because of the color of his skin. We learned the hard way what a disaster that has been. Hillary’s only attribute is she is a female. Americans have learned their lesson. There are plenty of great women who could be President. Just not her.

Run Hillary run. We need a Republican president.

Hillary and terrorists

Hillary with the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist leaders whom she and Obama helped take over Libya. Her top aid is from a prominent Muslim brotherhood family.  Huma Abedin, is the Deputy Chief of  Hillary Clinton when she was Sec State and her closest aid for years

With Mrs Arafat

Is Hillary the most dangerous person ever to be on a national stage besides Carter and Obama?

Is Hillary the most dangerous person ever to be on a national stage besides Carter and Obama? Hillary Clinton: America Must “Empathize” With Our Enemies…

Thursday, December 4, 2014

So she wants us to empathize with countries like Iran and North Korea?
Check it out:

“This is what we call smart power, using every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security. Leaving no one on the sidelines. Showing respect even for one’s enemies. Trying to understand, in so far as psychologically possible, empathize with their perspective and point of view.


Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/2014/12/hillary-clinton-america-must-empathize-enemies/

Obama, and all liberals base it all on lies

Why is anyone so surprised the Obamacare purposely was based on lies? That's what liberalism is based on, deception and lies. Obama not only lied about that, he lies about everything: His and Hillary's take on Benghazi was all lies, "I have Israel's back" was a total lie, "iran will never get nuclear weapons" is a total lie, he lied when he said heard about IRS, Va, Ap scandals etc when we did. the list goes on and on. It is because saul Alinsky taught him and liberals it is perfectly fine to lie to advance your ideas because everyone else is stupid. You know whom another huge Alinsky student is? Hillary Clinton. if you are dumb enough to support her, don't complain 4 years from now when things are even worse.
read below and weep
By Charles Lipson

Arrogance and condescension have been essential to progressive politics for a century.
November 13, 2014, 3:30 PM

The viral video of the week, at least among policy wonks, shows one of Obamacare's key architects saying that the health care law passed only because the administration deceived the public. MIT professor Jonathan Gruber spoke candidly — and proudly — because he thought he was speaking only to a small audience of fellow academics. Unfortunately for Gruber, he was being filmed, and the video has now found a much larger, less sympathetic audience..

He cannot shrug his comments off as a momentary mistake. Two more videos have now surfaced with the same message.


Gruber speaks as an insider, someone who met directly with the president about the health care law and was deeply involved in crafting its provisions. He speaks with considerable authority when he says Obamacare passed only because of deliberate deception. He notes that some of the law's complex wording was added only because the American public would be "too stupid" to figure it out (his words).

Well the public is listening now and is not too dimwitted to grasp the message. That's bad news for the Obama administration and worse news for a health care law already in deep trouble.

Gruber's admission should be old news since we already knew the president sold the program in misleading ways. So what's new here?
Until Gruber's videos appeared, it was hard to prove the administration actually intended to deceive voters when it rammed through the legislation on straight party-line votes. Perhaps the president was simply making statements he believed to be true but later turned out to be false. That's not lying. That's an honest mistake.

The Gruber videos are devastating because they say flatly that the deception was premeditated and was used self-consciously to pass the law. The professor goes further and says the law would have been defeated if its central provisions had been known to voters.




Obama and 'the stupidity of the American voter'h

by Kathleen Parker



Assuming Gruber's message is true, it means the Obama administration deliberately evaded our democratic process to pass its signature legislation. Its justification, which Gruber makes explicit, is not only that "we know what's best for you," but also that "you are too dense to know that yourself."

This arrogant, condescending approach extends far beyond Obamacare. It is an essential feature of progressive politics for the past century. From the outset, progressive politics yoked expert advice to expansive state action, especially redistributive policies to help the poor.

It says, "We are experts who want to help you, the great unwashed. You are too stupid and uneducated to know how to know what's best for you. Since we do know, and since we have your best interests at heart, we will handle those complex choices for you."

It's an intellectual's version of noblesse oblige.

Hard to accept your ideas are a total failure

It must be tough on liberals to see that their ideas have been a total failure once tried and the American people stood up Tuesday with a loud voice and said "stop Obama." What a repudiation of Democrats and Obama. Here are some of the reasons why : first domestic and then terrorism
1. EMPLOYMENT: Because of Obama’s policies since he became President,: 11,472,000 Americans have left the work force. “Fewer Americans are at work today than in April 2000, even though the population since then has grown by 31 million.” –: Mortimer Zuckerman
2. INCRESED DEPENDENCY on Handouts: POVERTY The number of Americans on welfare has hit record highs. A record: 20% of Americans were on food stamps: in 2013. The almost 11 million Americans: getting disability payments: is now approaching the population of Cuba
3. Our nation lost its AAA credit rating because Obama is spending so much money.
4. Not only was Cash for Clunkers a wasteful government program that: “cost $1.4 million for every job it created and did little to reduce carbon emissions,”destroying the “clunkers” helped dramatically jack up the cost of used cars for the rest of the country.
5. Obama has helped drive up the cost of gas by blocking the Keystone Pipeline.
6. When he was running for office in 2008, Obama claimed that,: “Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”: He lied.
7.Through 2013, the Obama Administration had imposed: new regulations on businesses that cost 46 billion dollars a year.
8. RECORD DEBT: When he was running for office, Obama called Bush “unpatriotic” for adding so much to the debt and promised to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. Yet, the national debt is up: 7 trillion dollars: since Obama became President. That’s more debt than all U.S. Presidents from George Washington through Bill Clinton combined.
9. SCANDAL: Obama’s administration gave guns to Mexican cartels that were used to murder hundreds of Mexicans and border agent Brian Terry. The Obama Administration has refused to cooperate with the investigation or hold anyone accountable for that illegal behavior.
10. Chrony Handouts: Obama’s campaign contributors at Solyndra were handed 535 million dollars of taxpayer money that the Obama Administration knew they would never be able to pay back before they gave it to them.
11 SCANDAL When the EPA and IRS were asked to provide emails requested by Congress as part of an investigation into their illegal activities, they’ve claimed over and over again to have lost the information because of “hard drive crashes.” Given that it’s quite easy to back up a hard drive and that they’re required by law to retain that information, it seems likely that they’re habitually destroying evidence to hide their illegal activities. The IRS targeted Obama’s political enemies including Christian groups, pro-Israel groups, and most prominently, Tea Party groups. The Obama Administration has refused to cooperate with the investigation or hold anyone accountable for the illegal behavior. Numerous donors to Mitt Romney were audited by the IRS after giving him large contributions.
12. SCANDAL: Veterans received poor health care and even died because of the incompetence and cover-ups of Obama’s VA.
13. OBAMACARE: Even Barney Frank admits Barack Obama: shamelessly lied to the American people to get Obamacare passed: — and lie, he did. He promised that Americans could keep their insurance plans, that they could keep their doctors, and that Obamacare would save the average family $2500 per year. Not only were all of those lies, Obama knew they were lies when he made those promises. Barack Obama has broken the law repeatedly: by making at least 23 unilateral changes to Obamacare.Obama has been illegally trying to force Christians to pay for abortifacients via Obamacare. Obamacare has been a disaster that cost millions their insurance and sent health care costs spiraling into the stratosphere. Obama is taking 700 billion dollars out of Medicare to put into Obamacare. The website portion of Obamacare, healthcare.gov, was a non-functional disaster for months when it rolled out and Obama claimed he was completely unaware that there was anything wrong with it.
14. INCREASED RACIAL TENSION: Instead of calming people down, Obama helped to turn Americans against each other racially be inserting himself into the Trayvon Martin case. Obama created so much racial animosity by attacking the police when they had done nothing wrong in the Henry Louis Gates case that he had to have a ridiculous “beer summit” to try to undo the damage. The Department of Justice failed to pursue a voter intimidation case against members of the New Black Panthers because they were black and liberal. Former DOJ official: J. Christian Adams quit over the case: and: “accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims.”
15. George W. Bush quit playing golf in 2003 because he didn’t want the mother of some fallen soldier to see the Commander-in-Chief out playing golf. He also said he thought playing golf during a war sent the wrong signal to the American people. Through June of 2014, Obama was up to 200 rounds and is on pace to play twice as much in his second term as his first term.
16. Obama chose tax cheat Tim Geithner to be his Secretary of the Treasury and then has had the audacity to spend his whole presidency pushing for higher taxes.
17. After promising to unite America when he was running for office in 2008, Obama has been the most hyper-partisan President in decades.
18. The Department of Justice has worked overtime to help increase voter fraud by fighting against voter ID. This is despite the fact that you need ID to buy alcohol, drive a car, fly on a plane or even to use Obamacare.
19. He’s responsible for the dumbing down of our education system with Common Core.
38) We first landed on the moon in 1969, but because of Obama, we’re no longer even capable of going into space.
20. His servile bowing to other world leaders is embarrassing and un-American.
21. Russia annexed Crimea while Obama did nothing of consequence to discourage it from invading. That’s not a surprise for a President who is fond of throwing out “red lines” that don’t mean anything.
22. Southern Border and illegal aliens Barack Obama unilaterally implemented the DREAM Act that Congress didn’t pass and illegally handed out work permits to illegal aliens. Obama is threatening to bypass Congress and simply “legalize” millions more of illegal immigrants even though it’s illegal and unconstitutional and it hurts the American people and will further encourage even more illegal aliens to surge across the border. The fence on our southern border was supposed to be completed by 2009. The Obama Administration has made it clear that it doesn’t intend to finish it during his presidency. Barack Obama is deliberately creating a crisis on the southern border by refusing to deport illegal aliens crossing into our country.For all practical purposes, Barack Obama has already unilaterally implemented amnesty in America because “at least: 99.92% of illegal immigrants and visa overstays: without known crimes on their records”: aren’t being deported.
23. All of our allies do not trust him and our enemies and adversaries have been emboldened by him.
Plus all the evidence Obama is aiding and abetting jihad Overwhelming Evidence Obama is pro Islamic terror
Why does Steve Emerson, world terrorism expert, say Obama is pro violent Islamic Jihad?
I think it is illogical to dispute it based on the EVIDENCE. For PC reasons, people are afriad to admit it. Very dangerous and sad.
- In Egypt Obama wanted Mubarak overthrown in favor on terrorists Muslim Brotherhood, to whom he gave our f16s and 1.5 bullion until they were overthrown by Egyptians.
-He has employed at least 6 top Muslim brotherhood officials in his administration.
-He traded 5 top Taliban terrorists in US custody for alleged deserter Bergdal. Obama lied about Benghazi, blaming it on youtube video no one watched instead of the organized 9-11 Al Quida attack on our embassy.
-In Libya he wanted Quadafi overthrown and now Libya is in the hands of many terrorist groups. Terrorists Hamas he has given much money and held illegal secret talks.
ISIS: He did nothing to stop Isis for years and grudgingly began pathetic bombing campaign out of political decision. He calls Isis IsiL just to humiliate Israel, which is included in the Levant.
- Pulls all our troops out of Iraq, making way for Isis to take over, despite clear warnings this would happen from President Bush.
-Iran, fought tough sanctions for years and now will make a weak deal that will hurt Israel forever just to say he made a deal. His # 1 aid, Valerie Jarett, born in Iran.
-His CIA director calls jihad “noble” and will not say Jeruslame, calls it Arab name Al quids.
-Top 3 foreign policy team, Hagel at Defense, Kerry at State, Powers at UN and Rice national security all have long record of anti israel and anti Semitic statements.
-He claims Turkey’s leader is his best friend of foreign leaders even though Erdogan calls Israel more barbaric than Hitler and states there is no difference between radical Islam and islam.
-Obama continues to deny Isis has anything to do with Islam.
-Obama will not allow FBI, CIA and Homeland security to use the word Islamic and has called obvious US soil attacks from Muslims workplace violence etc. Obama demands scrubbing word jihad from documents on terror and demands CIA Director scrub word Islamist before the word “terrorists” from Benghazi talking points.
-Obama tried to cut Iron Dome funding to Israel but congress restored.
-Psychological motivation: Obama’s father was a Muslim radical and Obama is obsessed with his Muslim father. Read his book “dreams From My Father.” Middle name Hussein.
-Personal history: Obama attended a radically Anti American anti Semitic church for 27 years. Obama was very close to Islamic radicals throughout his schooling, including Rashid Kjalidi.
- Massively increasing Islamic immigration to USA http://www.jewsnews.co.il/…/us-canada-will-have-largest-in…/
-Obama has refused to control US southern border, allowing how many terrorists to cross.
-Obama-lifts-ban-barring-libyans-from-us-flight-schools-and-nuclear-studies.
- Qatar, the biggest financer of terrorism, Qatar, Obama has cozied up to, establishing 11 billion trade deal on arms and tried to use as broker for Israel/Palestinian issues.
-Lost whereabouts of 6000 “students” of foreign nationality who never showed up for class.
-Obama-praises-muslim-cleric-who-backed-fatwa-on-killing-of-u-s-soldiers/
-Failure to control southern border allowed http://insider.foxnews.com/…/are-isis-terrorists-sneaking-u…
- http://www.redflagnews.com/…/report-barack-obamas-outraged-…
-and now Nov. 1 2014 unbelievably report from Erutz Sheva: “The same Tuesday night that a senior official in US President Barack Obama's administration was quoted calling Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu "chickens**t," more officials indicated the US is warming up to cooperation with Iran - the Islamic regime seeking nuclear weapons that has repeatedly declared its desire to destroy Israel…The American mollycoddling of Iran has extended to its proxy terror organizations Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon as well, according to officials, who said that despite there being no official cooperation with any of the parties American positions have definitely shifted.”
Our President is playing for the other team, the one wearing terrorist jerseys.
Terrorism expert summarizes this: “Steve Emerson Terrorism expert“ we have an administration that's in bed with these radical Islamic groups who pretend to be moderate or civil rights groups that have basically curtailed the ability of the FBI, ICE agents, to monitor, do investigations, or even prosecutors. Prosecutors now have to petition the Department of Justice to use the word "jihad" in indictments. This shows you the extent to which this administration has neutered the whole campaign to stop jihadism and basically interfere, Monica, with the ability of FBI agents to do their job...,the FBI, city and state law enforcement and now the border patrol with essentially an open border with god knows what kind of terrorists and Islamists are coming over the southern border, how they have really been hamstrung by regulations and political correctness restricting their ability to monitor the Islamic communities and the border...this administration has essentially embraced and legitimized the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the godfather and parent of all Sunni terrorist groups, including Hamas, including Islamic Jihad, and Al Qaeda. And for the administration to make a distinction between Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood is simply murderous. And that's what they've done.”:
http://obamaworstuspresident.blogspot.com/…/hard-to-accept-…

why today matters

Why today matters:
1. Gridlock: 100% Democrats fault Harry Reid has held up 350 bills passed by republican house to fix the horrible mess Obama and Dems have caused and only a Senate majority Dems can fix it, and try and get Obama to sign it or override his veto.

2. Democratic policies are ruing the country and the world: Poverty: 50th anniversary of LBJ’s war on Poverty, 422 trillion spent to alleviate poverty and Obama has given us RECORD poverty, Maimonides taught the highest form of charity is loans and jobs. Democrats goal is never ending dependency to keep them voting for them and they have achieved it, plus record family disintegration, single family poor households. Their ideas are counterproductive and harmful. They have given us doubling all previous US debt under Obama, record deficits, record middle class economic loss, record % adults not in labor market, ruined best health care system in the world, lied and lied : keep your plan, keep your doctor, premiums will go down, SCANDAL after scandal: VA abuse, IRS abuse, lied about Benghazzi, Guns to Mexican drug gangs, tyrannize reporters, chrony huge gifts to failed companies, NO CONTROL SOUTHERN BORDER so allowing huge numbers disease, gangs and terrorist to cross, alienate our allies and embolden our adversaries and enemies : China, Russia, Muslim terrorists, they have gutted our military and weakened it,

3. Democrats have run disgusting campaigns: They have run from the worst US President ever and not even admitted they are Democrats in some cases, and campaigned on 2 lies almost exclusively: phony “war on women” and racism when they are the ones increasing racial strife. Plus they are advocating voter fraud by opposing ID rules, when obviously you need an  ID to do anything in the world and the Dems just want people to cheat. That is the only way they can win.

4. Their leader is pro terrorist.  And anti Israel
Overwhelming Evidence Obama is pro Islamic terror
Why does Steve Emerson, world terrorism expert, say Obama is pro violent Islamic Jihad? I think it is illogical to dispute it based on the EVIDENCE. In Egypt Obama wanted Mubarak overthrown in favor on terrorists Muslim Brotherhood, to whom he gave our f16s and 1.5 bullion until they were overthrown by Egyptians. He has employed at least 6 top Muslim brotherhood officials in his administration. He traded 5 top Taliban terrorists in US custody for alleged deserter Bergdal. Obama lied about Benghazi, blaming it on youtube video no one watched instead of the organized 9-11 Al Quida attack on our embassy. In Libya he wanted Quaddafi overthrown and now Libya is in the hands of many terrorist groups. Terrorists Hamas he has given much money and held illegal secret talks. He did nothing to stop isis for years and grudgingly began pathetic bombing campaign out of political decision. He calls Isis IsiL just to humiliate Israel, which is included in the Levant. Pulls all our troops out of Iraq, making way for Isis to take over, despite clear warnings this would happen from President Bush. Iran, fought tough sanctions for years and now will make a weak deal that will hurt Israel forever just to say he made a deal. He claims Turkey’s leader is his best friend of foreign leaders even though Erdogan calls Israel more barbaric than Hitler and states there is no difference between radical Islam and islam. Obama continues to deny isis has anything to do with islam. Obama will not allow FBI, CIA and Homeland security to use the word Islamic and has called obvious US soil attacks from Muslims workplace violence etc. Obama demands scrubbing word jihad from documents on terror and demands CIA Director scrub word Islamist before the word “terrorists” from Benghazi talking points. Obama tried to cut Iron Dome funding to Israel but congress restored. Obama’s father was a Muslim radical and Obama is obsessed with his Muslim father. Read his book “dreams From My Father.” Middle name Hussein. Obama attended a radically Anti American anti Semitic church for 27 years. Obama was very close to Islamic radicals throughout his schooling, including Rashid Kjalidi. Obama has refused to control US southern border, allowing how many terrorists to cross. Obama-lifts-ban-barring-libyans-from-us-flight-schools-and-nuclear-studies. Qatar, the biggest financier of terrorism, Qatar, Obama has cosied upo to, establishing 11 billion trade deal on arms and tried to use as broker for Israel/Palestinian issues. Lost whereabouts of 6000 “students” of foreign nationality who never showed up for class. Obama-praises-muslim-cleric-who-backed-fatwa-on-killing-of-u-s-soldiers/ and now Nov. 1 2014 unbelievably report from Erutz Sheva: “The same Tuesday night that a senior official in US President Barack Obama's administration was quoted calling Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu "chickens**t," more officials indicated the US is warming up to cooperation with Iran - the Islamic regime seeking nuclear weapons that has repeatedly declared its desire to destroy Israel…The American mollycoddling of Iran has extended to its proxy terror organizations Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon as well, according to officials, who said that despite there being no official cooperation with any of the parties American positions have definitely shifted.”
Our President is playing for the other team, the one wearing terrorist jerseys.
Terrorism expert summarizes this: “Steve Emerson Terrorism expert“we have an administration that's in bed with these radical Islamic groups who pretend to be moderate or civil rights groups that have basically curtailed the ability of the FBI, ICE agents, to monitor, do investigations, or even prosecutors. Prosecutors now have to petition the Department of Justice to use the word "jihad" in indictments. This shows you the extent to which this administration has neutered the whole campaign to stop jihadism and basically interfere, Monica, with the ability of FBI agents to do their job...,the FBI, city and state law enforcement and now the border patrol with essentially an open border with god knows what kind of terrorists and Islamists are coming over the southern border, how they have really been hamstrung by regulations and political correctness restricting their ability to monitor the Islamic communities and the border...this administration has essentially embraced and legitimized the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the godfather and parent of all Sunni terrorist groups, including Hamas, including Islamic Jihad, and Al Qaeda. And for the administration to make a distinction between Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood is simply murderous. And that's what they've done. And  Obama by far, most anti Israel US president ever and only pro jihadist  http://obamaworstuspresident.blogspot.com/p/worst-for-israel.html
Bennett Blasts Obama:
'The current administration plans to throw Israel under the bus. Not the leader of Syria who has massacred 150,000 of his citizens, nor the leader of Saudi Arabia who stones women and homosexuals, nor the leader of Iran who murdered demonstrators for freedom were called "chickensh*t." '

stealing elections

Richard Baehr

The Democrats love to say that vote fraud is rare to non-existent.

That is false. It must just be the luck of the draw that Democrats win about 85% of the closest House, Senate and Governors races. Races that were almost certainly stolen  include Tim Johnson's Senate win in 2002, Christine Gregoire's win in the 2004 Governors race in Washington, and Al Franken's "victory" in the Senate race in 2008. The votes of non-citizens (2-6% of whom vote), usually about  80% for Democrats, according to a study by professors at Old Dominion University,  likely made the difference in a few of these.

Some  evidence in Maryland: http://tinyurl.com/mhna729

La Raza tells you where to vote without an ID: http://tinyurl.com/mo26eh5

I was shocked that this could happen in Illinois: http://tinyurl.com/kl7hzep

Or Maryland: http://tinyurl.com/p8gl785

John Fund on how fraud could shift the vote in Colorado, where there are two very close statewide races: http://tinyurl.com/lreuexg

Mona Charen:  http://tinyurl.com/mq8gt2j

As a rule, Democrats argue that they just want to make it easier for people to vote, and that Republican concerns about vote fraud are really designed to restrict minority access to the polls. Funny, but in states where some changes in voter identification were added, minority participation rose. The percentage of whites and blacks without voter ID  is about the same. In other words, this is just one more superstition without evidence, I guess, to add to the list for liberals.  There is no question that charging Republicans with trying to restrict the votes of blacks, plays well as a get out the vote mechanism for African Americans. Throw in Trayvon and Ferguson, and you might think we were back in Jim Crow days.

When you have weak candidates, and an even weaker record to run on,  only a heavy black turnout can help some Democrats survive  : http://tinyurl.com/mdusbqo

Muslim campaign money to Dems

Islamist Campaign Donors Overwhelmingly Back Democrats

by David J. Rusin
PJ Media
October 31, 2014

http://www.islamist-watch.org/17912/islamist-campaign-donors-overwhelmingly-back

Print

Send

RSS

Share

An analysis of federal campaign contributions finds that key figures at six of America's most prominent Islamist organizations have favored Democrats over Republicans by a ratio of 12 to 1 since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. This trend began with multiple donations to Cynthia McKinney dated September 11, 2001, reversing a previous pattern that had seen Islamist officials spend slightly more on Republicans. Their preference for Democrats has solidified during the past 13 years and shows no signs of waning. What does this say about the politicians who benefit from Islamist largesse?
Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum, recently launched Islamist Money in Politics (IMIP), to monitor Islamists' influence in the halls of power, inform the public about which politicians accept their tainted money, and hold accountable those who do. IMIP's inaugural data release focuses on the national organizations of six Islamist entities — the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA), Muslim American Society (MAS), and Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) — as well as CAIR's many local chapters.
Names of important personnel, both current and former, were mined from the groups' Internal Revenue Service filings and/or website listings, some going back more than a decade. The Federal Election Commission's online database, which spans the late 1990s to the present, was then searched for donations to candidates, joint fundraising committees, relevant political action committees, and parties. IMIP employed biographical information to select only those contributions that could reasonably be attributed to the individuals of interest, rejecting ones likely to have been made by unrelated persons who share their names. See IMIP's description of methodology for details and a discussion of the challenges.
As of now, the IMIP database tabulates nearly $700,000 in donations. Surely many more people and contributions remain to be added, but the data already constitute a large and representative sample that is sufficient for an initial pass at quantifying Islamists' political affinities.
First, who contributes? Major donors tend to be board members rather than staffers. While many of the biggest contributors maintain relatively low public profiles, several are quite familiar. With outlays totaling $56,800, the most generous funder of politicians in IMIP's database is Kenny Gamble, who goes by Luqman Abdul Haqq in his position on MANA's governing body. An Islamist-aligned music and real estate mogul, Gamble is tied to the "Islamic paramilitary boys group" known as the Jawala Scouts and has been accused of working to build a self-contained "black Muslim enclave" in South Philadelphia. Also among the top 20 donors are CAIR executive director Nihad Awad, who has contributed under numerous variants of his name; former MAS president and current CAIR national board member Esam Omeish, who resigned from a Virginia immigration panel in 2007 after a video emerged of his speech touting the Palestinians' embrace of "the jihad way" against Israel; and Zead Ramadan, the CAIR-New York board member who unsuccessfully ran for New York City Council in 2013.
With regard to recipients, the Democratic Party dominates. Leading the all-time list by vacuuming up close to one in every five dollars is Keith Ellison, the Islamist-leaning Muslim congressman from Minnesota who has a long history of collaborating with Islamist groups. Barack Obama, whose policies have been popular with Islamists, comes in second when direct contributions are combined with those sent to joint fundraising committees associated with his 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns. Third is Cynthia McKinney, the far-left former congresswoman from Georgia who peddled conspiracy theories and harsh critiques of U.S. foreign policy in the wake of 9/11; that she ranks so high despite the fact that most donations to her were collected during a one-year, post-9/11 window testifies to Islamists' endorsement of her adversarial stance at the outset of America's military response to Islamic terrorism. Fourth is Indiana's André Carson, the second Muslim congressman to be elected; he told attendees at the 2012 ICNA–MAS convention that educators should model American schools after Islamic madrassas. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee rounds out the top five.
However, Democrats did not always prevail in the battle for Islamist cash. According to IMIP's current data, Republicans actually received about 15 percent more Islamist-related contributions than Democrats did over the several years prior to 9/11. The Islamists' favorite Republican of that period was Californian Tom Campbell, who contested a Senate seat in 2000. Campbell's warm relationships with radical Muslims, such as terror operative Sami al-Arian, are thoroughly documented. Further, although IMIP features only a handful of entries from the 2000 presidential race, there is more money for George W. Bush than for Al Gore. This is not a surprise because Bush won the backing of the American Muslim Political Coordination Committee, an Islamist-heavy coalition.
But 9/11 and the subsequent Republican-led war on terror changed everything, even the destination of Islamist money. IMIP detects the first hints of a sharp left turn in the form of donations to Cynthia McKinney from three Islamist figures, including Nihad Awad, on September 11, 2001 — undoubtedly before the Bush administration had a chance to do much to upset the self-proclaimed guardians of the Muslim community in the post-9/11 era. IMIP records no other contribution to any recipient within two weeks in either direction, making the date seem less coincidental. Many more donations would be routed to McKinney from Islamists' wallets in the months to come. Over the 365 days that followed the 9/11 attacks, IMIP measures an 8-to-1 ratio of contributions in the Democrats' favor. A majority of them flowed to McKinney.
This pro-Democratic tilt has continued to the present. Based on contributions now cataloged by IMIP, Democrats outraised Republicans by a factor of 4.8 from 2003 to 2006, 29.7 from 2007 to 2010, and 17.5 from 2011 to 2014. The two most recent blocks reflect the impact of Islamist enthusiasm for Obama's White House runs. As for the last three Republican presidential nominees, IMIP has located no contributions to Bush's 2004 campaign, none to John McCain's in 2008, and just one to Mitt Romney for $1,000 ahead of the 2012 primaries. Overall, the people in IMIP's sample have donated 12 times as much to Democrats since September 11, 2001.
Islamist-affiliated individuals presumably support Democrats for the same reason that other subsets of Americans throw their weight behind certain politicians and parties: they expect Democrats to support them, at least at the level of providing the best political landscape in which to pursue their objectives. But as Daniel Pipes points out, we are not dealing here with professionals attempting to "tweak the tax code" to their advantage or even a minority population striving to secure equal rights. Islamists intend to alter the fabric of the liberal democratic system, a goal characterized by the Muslim Brotherhood, in a memorandum outlining its North American strategy, as "a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within," culminating in Islamic rule.
Each of the six groups analyzed by IMIP is connected to the Brotherhood or its dream of institutionalizing Shari'a. ICNA, ISNA, and the Islamic Association for Palestine, CAIR's immediate predecessor, appear on the Brotherhood's 1991 "list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends." Both CAIR and ISNA were designated as unindicted co-conspirators in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation, a charity convicted of bankrolling Hamas, the Brotherhood's Palestinian wing. Prosecutors classified CAIR among the "individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood's Palestine Committee and/or its organizations"; they named ISNA as one of the "individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood." Furthermore, according to a brief filed by the government in a separate case, "MAS was founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America." Two Muslim Brothers also formed MPAC. Finally, MANA is helmed by radical cleric Siraj Wahhaj, who has spoken of replacing the Constitution with Islamic law.
Because the various board members and staffers researched by IMIP have participated in defining and executing the ideological agendas of the above groups, their campaign contributions are a matter of concern. This is not to suggest that the dollar amounts uncovered thus far — quite small by American standards — are tipping any elections. But even in modest quantities, money can purchase political access and open the doors of influence. When it comes to the agents of radical Islam, these doors must be barred shut.
No remotely mainstream politician would knowingly accept, let alone get away with accepting, contributions from a leader of a white supremacist organization. Why should it be any different for a leader of an Islamic supremacist organization? Those who represent the American people or seek to do so, especially in federal offices that oversee counterterrorism and foreign affairs, need to begin saying no to funds from these problematic sources. Islamist Money in Politics is a first step in nudging candidates and parties toward the right decision — and, where that fails, empowering voters to make informed choices of their own about politicians who wittingly or unwittingly legitimize, enable, or embolden America's enemies.

David J. Rusin is a research fellow at Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.

Young switching to GOP

 a new poll finds a majority of young Americans who intend to vote next week prefer a Republican-controlled Congress.
A survey released yesterday by Harvard Institute of Politics shows that of those age 18 to 29 who say they “definitely” will vote in the midterm elections Tuesday, 51 percent want Congress in GOP hands, compared to 47 percent who would rather have Democrats in charge.

Hillary

Hillary will try this phony war on women stuff too

Carly Fiorina: Female Voters Fed Up With Phony 'War on Women'

Wednesday, 29 Oct 2014 06:32 PM

By Bill Hoffmann

Close 

More ways to share...

• 0
  inShare

• The nation is fed up with the phony "war on women" that Democrats are endlessly accusing Republicans of waging, says Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard.

"We have a lot of data which suggests that people are tiring of the slogans and the gestures. Women, as well as men," Fiorina saud Wednesday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.

"There is more and more evidence that women are swinging over to the Republican side and partially it's because one of the top issues for women is jobs and the economy, national security, healthcare and education.

"Women and men are realizing that these gestures and these slogans are not serious and that we're living in serious times. People are undergoing serious issues and we need serious leadership."

Fiorina said women make up 50 percent of the nation's population and represent 53 percent of voters, making them capable of swaying elections.

women are the majority of voters . . . They care about every issue because they're worried about their own jobs, their husband's job and their children's future. They look at the headlines on Ebola and ISIS and they're worried about our nation's security," she said.

"On top of everything else, this war on women propaganda the Democrats have been throwing out there for the last couple of election cycles is insulting to women. Every issue is a women's issue."

Much of the rabble-rousing against Republicans is created by "professional activists" who seek to hijack political discourse, according to Fiorina.

"It's fine for people to disagree, these are complex issues. What's not fine is that complex issues get boiled down to simple slogans that are wrong," she said.

"We have people, for example, who push back against any reasonable discussion of what our policy should be around energy and climate change by lumping people into one of two categories: you're either a global warming denier or you're on the right side of truth and the American way.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Carly-Fiorina-women-voters-fed-up/2014/10/29/id/603987/#ixzz3HgXNtbDC
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Hillary Claiming Businesses Don’t Create Jobs

Big Three’ Sunday Shows Ignore Hillary Claiming Businesses Don’t Create Jobs

By Jeffrey Meyer | October 26, 2014 | 12:16 PM EDT

 

 

During a campaign rally for Martha Coakley, Democratic gubernatorial candidate in Massachusetts, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made some controversial comments about private businesses not being job creators.
Speaking on Friday, Clinton told a Democratic audience to ignore people who say “corporations and businesses create jobs.” Despite the potential 2016 presidential candidate expressing far left anti-business sentiments, all three network Sunday morning political shows (ABC’s This Week, CBS’s Face The Nation, and NBC’s Meet the Press) conveniently ignored Ms. Clinton’s remarks during their midterm coverage. 

- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2014/10/26/big-three-sunday-shows-ignore-hillary-claiming-businesses-dont-create#.VE2vBEfsK5Y.facebook



after 6 years of utter devastation by Obama and dem policies in action, and after a career of zero successes, after "what difference does it make" and now this idiocy, are there really 50.1% of American voters who would vote for her? Yes, maybe people on welfare, career Dems, stupid people might get her over the top. scary 

Hillary copies Obama's radical leftiness

Appearing at a Boston rally for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley on Friday, Hillary Clinton told the crowd gathered at the Park Plaza Hotel not to listen to anybody who says that “businesses create jobs.”

“Don’t let anybody tell you it’s corporations and businesses create jobs,” Clinton said.

Arabs buying Democratic influence

Follow the money. Arab oil influence
Obama and Arab money  http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2012/09/obama-college-costs-paid-by-saudis-arabs-khalid-al-mansour-requested-arab-money-vernon-jarrett-percy-suttton-confirm-obama-bow-to-saudi-king-proves-loyalty-2446028.html
Martin Indyk US peace negotiator always takes Arab side. $15 million from Qatar http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/us-mediator-for-pal-arab-israel-relations-shared-sugar-daddy-with-hamas/2014/09/08/
Jimmy Carter always blasts Israel. Millions in Arab money http://www.factsandlogic.org/outstanding_dershowitz2.html
Clinton blasts Netanyahu yesterday. Clintons millions from Arab money. Hillary excuses Hamas firing from schols by claiming gaza is crowded. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/11/clinton-surpasses-75-million-in-speech-income-after-lucrative-2010/
Many universities including Harvard and Georgetown millions in Arab money.  http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-meir-levi/what-happened-to-harvards-veritas/   Columbia  Qatar money http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/1235
Arab money flowing to influential US leaders to influence them vs Israel!!
What should Israel do with billions it will get from their huge natural gas discoveries? Fight fire with fire.

Bashing israel

Another Democrat, another Israel bashing

By Jennifer Rubin September 16 at 4:02 PM 

Bill Clinton was caught off mike in Iowa this weekend “agreeing that the [Israeli] prime minister [Benjamin Netanyahu] was ‘not the man’ to make peace with Palestinians — a position at odds with his wife’s pro-Israel stance, a new report said Monday. Clinton’s spontaneous comments came during an impromptu conversation with pro-Palestinian activists after he and Hillary spent the day at a political event in Iowa on Sunday.” This is part of a pattern for Bill Clinton  – “blaming the Israeli prime minister for the lack of progress toward peace with the Palestinians.” What do we learn from this?

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton holds hands with her husband former president Bill Clinton at the 37th Harkin Steak Fry in Iowa. (Jim Young/Reuters)

1. Democrats in private seem always to bash our ally Israel and never to criticize the Palestinians. If you believe what people say in private or off-script is more revealing of their real thinking, then you can conclude an anti-Israel bias is now a sort of sign of solidarity among Democrats. At the State Department, as we have seen from John Kerry’s utterances and the Israel bashing from negotiator Martin Indyk, it’s par for the course.
2. Bill Clinton still plays loose with the facts. He opined that “don’t forget, both [former Palestinian leader Yasser] Arafat and [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas later tried to say they would take [the Camp David deal]. They said, ‘We changed our minds, we want it now.’ But by then, they had a government that wouldn’t give it to them.” This is nonsense. It was Clinton who complained bitterly to the incoming Bush administration that Arafat was a snake in the grass and not to be trusted. He of course initiated the intifada, which was Arafat’s real response to the attempt to broker peace. As for Abbas, he was given an even better deal by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and turned it down. Netanyahu in 2013, of course, confirmed Israel’s willingness to recognize a Palestinian state. Abbas has never agreed to recognize a Jewish state and give up the so-called right of return. Why does Clinton feel the need to embellish history to make Israel look bad?
3. This does complicate Hillary Clinton’s charm offensive with Israel. She’d like us to believe she’s not like President Obama when it comes to Israel, however relations reached a nadir under the Obama-Clinton administration, and she certainly took to slamming Israel in public for starting housing within existing Jewish neighborhoods.
4. If Bill Clinton is going to keep up the chatter during the presidency, voters may well attribute his comments — and ignorance — to Hillary Clinton or, worse, be reminded that his presence hovering in the White House would make for a whole lot of awkward moments.

5. The same pro-Israel liberals who would defend both Bill and Hillary Clinton also vouched for Obama’s pro-Israel sentiments. In public, Hillary Clinton, like Obama, will recite her pro-Israel credentials, but her words and action in public are more revealing; like so many other Democrats she tends to view Israel as an irritant. (Oh, and those same liberals will vote for her no matter what she says; Israel isn’t high on their priority list as we saw when they helped reelect Obama in 2012.
As with defense spending, the war against the Islamic State and a more muscular foreign policy, when it comes to Israel the Democratic Party is going to be pushing against even a president to the right of Obama. He or she will be swimming upstream against a party that has been flowing away from Israel for decades. In the GOP, the dynamic is reversed. The base, especially in light of events during the Obama years, is going to be weighing in on the side of Israel and for a more robust response toward terrorists. These things make a difference.

Hillary and Obstruction of Justice

Report: “Queen” Clinton’s “henchmen” scrubbed Benghazi documents

Posted: 15 Sep 2014 12:15 PM PDT

(Paul Mirengoff) Raymond Maxwell was the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Maghreb (North Africa) Affairs at the State Department’s Bureau of Near East Affairs from 2011-2012. When Hillary Clinton removed him from this position and placed him on leave in the aftermath of the Benghazi attacks, Maxwell wrote a poem called “Invitation” which we posted here. The “invitation” as the poem made clear, was to “lynching” and it came from the “henchmen” of “the Queen” (Hillary Clinton).
Now, Maxwell is back in the news, and this time not for poetry. Maxwell tells Sharyl Attkisson that Hillary Clinton’s henchmen were part of an operation to “separate” damaging material before documents were turned over to the Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses in connection with the Benghazi attacks.

The alleged weeding out of documents took place during a weekend in a basement operations-type center at State Department headquarters in Washington, says Maxwell. He received no “invitation” to this event, but “heard about it and decided to check it out on a Sunday afternoon.” At this point, he had not yet been scapegoated for Benghazi.

When Maxwell arrived, he noticed boxes and stacks of documents. A State Department office director who, according to Maxwell was close to Clinton’s top advisers, was present. Although technically this office director worked for him, Maxwell says she didn’t consult with him about her weekend assignment.

Here’s what happened next, according to what Maxwell told Attkisson:

[The office director] told me, “Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor [where Clinton and her principal advisors worked] in a bad light. I asked her, “But isn’t that unethical?” She responded, “Ray, those are our orders.”

A few minutes later, says Maxwell, two high-ranking State Department officials entered the room. The two have been identified by Rep. Josh Chaffetz as Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan — the leading henchmen at the Queen’s disposal. Mills, who first came to prominence defending Bill Clinton during his impeachment, was not pleased to see Maxwell:

“Who are you?” [Mills snapped]. Jake explained, “That’s Ray Maxwell, an NEA Deputy Assistant Secretary.” She conceded, “Well, OK.”

The Accountability Review Board has been criticized for, among other things, a lack of thoroughness. Its co-chairmen have countered by claiming that they had “unfettered access to everyone and everything including all the documentation we needed.” But Maxwell’s account, if true, shows that the ARB’s access was not “unfettered.”

Maxwell’s allegations are of obvious interest to the House Select Committee on Benghazi. Attkisson reports that Trey Gowdy, the chairman of that body, has already interviewed Maxwell.

Josh Chaffetz, who has also spoken to Maxwell, tells Attkisson that his allegations “go to the heart of the integrity of the State Department” and “are as serious as it gets.” He adds that they have been “followed up and pursued.”

That can’t be good news for the Queen. 

pictures

What does she think is greatest concern?

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/09/05/what-is-it-that-hillary-says-is-the-most-consequential-challenge-facing-america/

Let me guess: 91 million Americans out of labor market? record poverty? record debt? Muslim terrorism? Russians? record middle class losses? No, the falsehood of climate change. What an idiot.

Hillary excuses hamas

VIDEO: You’ll Never Believe Why Hillary Said Hamas Plants Its Bombs in Schools

July 29, 2014 By Jennifer Burke

18795 SHARES

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who many believe will seek to be the Democrat nominee for president in 2016, made a statement about the tactics of the terrorist group Hamas in their fight against Israel.


Hamas has been widely criticized for using women and children as shields in their bombings. They have also drawn criticism for storing their rockets and missiles in civilian areas, including schools and hospitals. This practice has led many to attack Israel for their response to Hamas in attacking these areas, though they have no choice since Hamas put their own people in harm’s way.
During a recent interview with Jorge Ramos on Fusion TV, Hillary Clinton addressed the issue of Hamas storing their missiles and rockets in these civilian areas.

The problem is, and this is something — I’m not a military planner, but Hamas puts its missiles, its rockets in civilian areas, part of it is is that Gaza’s pretty small and its densely populated. They put their command and control of Hamas military leaders in those civilian areas.