why today matters

Why today matters:
1. Gridlock: 100% Democrats fault Harry Reid has held up 350 bills passed by republican house to fix the horrible mess Obama and Dems have caused and only a Senate majority Dems can fix it, and try and get Obama to sign it or override his veto.

2. Democratic policies are ruing the country and the world: Poverty: 50th anniversary of LBJ’s war on Poverty, 422 trillion spent to alleviate poverty and Obama has given us RECORD poverty, Maimonides taught the highest form of charity is loans and jobs. Democrats goal is never ending dependency to keep them voting for them and they have achieved it, plus record family disintegration, single family poor households. Their ideas are counterproductive and harmful. They have given us doubling all previous US debt under Obama, record deficits, record middle class economic loss, record % adults not in labor market, ruined best health care system in the world, lied and lied : keep your plan, keep your doctor, premiums will go down, SCANDAL after scandal: VA abuse, IRS abuse, lied about Benghazzi, Guns to Mexican drug gangs, tyrannize reporters, chrony huge gifts to failed companies, NO CONTROL SOUTHERN BORDER so allowing huge numbers disease, gangs and terrorist to cross, alienate our allies and embolden our adversaries and enemies : China, Russia, Muslim terrorists, they have gutted our military and weakened it,

3. Democrats have run disgusting campaigns: They have run from the worst US President ever and not even admitted they are Democrats in some cases, and campaigned on 2 lies almost exclusively: phony “war on women” and racism when they are the ones increasing racial strife. Plus they are advocating voter fraud by opposing ID rules, when obviously you need an  ID to do anything in the world and the Dems just want people to cheat. That is the only way they can win.

4. Their leader is pro terrorist.  And anti Israel
Overwhelming Evidence Obama is pro Islamic terror
Why does Steve Emerson, world terrorism expert, say Obama is pro violent Islamic Jihad? I think it is illogical to dispute it based on the EVIDENCE. In Egypt Obama wanted Mubarak overthrown in favor on terrorists Muslim Brotherhood, to whom he gave our f16s and 1.5 bullion until they were overthrown by Egyptians. He has employed at least 6 top Muslim brotherhood officials in his administration. He traded 5 top Taliban terrorists in US custody for alleged deserter Bergdal. Obama lied about Benghazi, blaming it on youtube video no one watched instead of the organized 9-11 Al Quida attack on our embassy. In Libya he wanted Quaddafi overthrown and now Libya is in the hands of many terrorist groups. Terrorists Hamas he has given much money and held illegal secret talks. He did nothing to stop isis for years and grudgingly began pathetic bombing campaign out of political decision. He calls Isis IsiL just to humiliate Israel, which is included in the Levant. Pulls all our troops out of Iraq, making way for Isis to take over, despite clear warnings this would happen from President Bush. Iran, fought tough sanctions for years and now will make a weak deal that will hurt Israel forever just to say he made a deal. He claims Turkey’s leader is his best friend of foreign leaders even though Erdogan calls Israel more barbaric than Hitler and states there is no difference between radical Islam and islam. Obama continues to deny isis has anything to do with islam. Obama will not allow FBI, CIA and Homeland security to use the word Islamic and has called obvious US soil attacks from Muslims workplace violence etc. Obama demands scrubbing word jihad from documents on terror and demands CIA Director scrub word Islamist before the word “terrorists” from Benghazi talking points. Obama tried to cut Iron Dome funding to Israel but congress restored. Obama’s father was a Muslim radical and Obama is obsessed with his Muslim father. Read his book “dreams From My Father.” Middle name Hussein. Obama attended a radically Anti American anti Semitic church for 27 years. Obama was very close to Islamic radicals throughout his schooling, including Rashid Kjalidi. Obama has refused to control US southern border, allowing how many terrorists to cross. Obama-lifts-ban-barring-libyans-from-us-flight-schools-and-nuclear-studies. Qatar, the biggest financier of terrorism, Qatar, Obama has cosied upo to, establishing 11 billion trade deal on arms and tried to use as broker for Israel/Palestinian issues. Lost whereabouts of 6000 “students” of foreign nationality who never showed up for class. Obama-praises-muslim-cleric-who-backed-fatwa-on-killing-of-u-s-soldiers/ and now Nov. 1 2014 unbelievably report from Erutz Sheva: “The same Tuesday night that a senior official in US President Barack Obama's administration was quoted calling Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu "chickens**t," more officials indicated the US is warming up to cooperation with Iran - the Islamic regime seeking nuclear weapons that has repeatedly declared its desire to destroy Israel…The American mollycoddling of Iran has extended to its proxy terror organizations Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon as well, according to officials, who said that despite there being no official cooperation with any of the parties American positions have definitely shifted.”
Our President is playing for the other team, the one wearing terrorist jerseys.
Terrorism expert summarizes this: “Steve Emerson Terrorism expert“we have an administration that's in bed with these radical Islamic groups who pretend to be moderate or civil rights groups that have basically curtailed the ability of the FBI, ICE agents, to monitor, do investigations, or even prosecutors. Prosecutors now have to petition the Department of Justice to use the word "jihad" in indictments. This shows you the extent to which this administration has neutered the whole campaign to stop jihadism and basically interfere, Monica, with the ability of FBI agents to do their job...,the FBI, city and state law enforcement and now the border patrol with essentially an open border with god knows what kind of terrorists and Islamists are coming over the southern border, how they have really been hamstrung by regulations and political correctness restricting their ability to monitor the Islamic communities and the border...this administration has essentially embraced and legitimized the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the godfather and parent of all Sunni terrorist groups, including Hamas, including Islamic Jihad, and Al Qaeda. And for the administration to make a distinction between Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood is simply murderous. And that's what they've done. And  Obama by far, most anti Israel US president ever and only pro jihadist  http://obamaworstuspresident.blogspot.com/p/worst-for-israel.html
Bennett Blasts Obama:
'The current administration plans to throw Israel under the bus. Not the leader of Syria who has massacred 150,000 of his citizens, nor the leader of Saudi Arabia who stones women and homosexuals, nor the leader of Iran who murdered demonstrators for freedom were called "chickensh*t." '

stealing elections

Richard Baehr

The Democrats love to say that vote fraud is rare to non-existent.

That is false. It must just be the luck of the draw that Democrats win about 85% of the closest House, Senate and Governors races. Races that were almost certainly stolen  include Tim Johnson's Senate win in 2002, Christine Gregoire's win in the 2004 Governors race in Washington, and Al Franken's "victory" in the Senate race in 2008. The votes of non-citizens (2-6% of whom vote), usually about  80% for Democrats, according to a study by professors at Old Dominion University,  likely made the difference in a few of these.

Some  evidence in Maryland: http://tinyurl.com/mhna729

La Raza tells you where to vote without an ID: http://tinyurl.com/mo26eh5

I was shocked that this could happen in Illinois: http://tinyurl.com/kl7hzep

Or Maryland: http://tinyurl.com/p8gl785

John Fund on how fraud could shift the vote in Colorado, where there are two very close statewide races: http://tinyurl.com/lreuexg

Mona Charen:  http://tinyurl.com/mq8gt2j

As a rule, Democrats argue that they just want to make it easier for people to vote, and that Republican concerns about vote fraud are really designed to restrict minority access to the polls. Funny, but in states where some changes in voter identification were added, minority participation rose. The percentage of whites and blacks without voter ID  is about the same. In other words, this is just one more superstition without evidence, I guess, to add to the list for liberals.  There is no question that charging Republicans with trying to restrict the votes of blacks, plays well as a get out the vote mechanism for African Americans. Throw in Trayvon and Ferguson, and you might think we were back in Jim Crow days.

When you have weak candidates, and an even weaker record to run on,  only a heavy black turnout can help some Democrats survive  : http://tinyurl.com/mdusbqo

Muslim campaign money to Dems

Islamist Campaign Donors Overwhelmingly Back Democrats

by David J. Rusin
PJ Media
October 31, 2014

http://www.islamist-watch.org/17912/islamist-campaign-donors-overwhelmingly-back

Print

Send

RSS

Share

An analysis of federal campaign contributions finds that key figures at six of America's most prominent Islamist organizations have favored Democrats over Republicans by a ratio of 12 to 1 since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. This trend began with multiple donations to Cynthia McKinney dated September 11, 2001, reversing a previous pattern that had seen Islamist officials spend slightly more on Republicans. Their preference for Democrats has solidified during the past 13 years and shows no signs of waning. What does this say about the politicians who benefit from Islamist largesse?
Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum, recently launched Islamist Money in Politics (IMIP), to monitor Islamists' influence in the halls of power, inform the public about which politicians accept their tainted money, and hold accountable those who do. IMIP's inaugural data release focuses on the national organizations of six Islamist entities — the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA), Muslim American Society (MAS), and Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) — as well as CAIR's many local chapters.
Names of important personnel, both current and former, were mined from the groups' Internal Revenue Service filings and/or website listings, some going back more than a decade. The Federal Election Commission's online database, which spans the late 1990s to the present, was then searched for donations to candidates, joint fundraising committees, relevant political action committees, and parties. IMIP employed biographical information to select only those contributions that could reasonably be attributed to the individuals of interest, rejecting ones likely to have been made by unrelated persons who share their names. See IMIP's description of methodology for details and a discussion of the challenges.
As of now, the IMIP database tabulates nearly $700,000 in donations. Surely many more people and contributions remain to be added, but the data already constitute a large and representative sample that is sufficient for an initial pass at quantifying Islamists' political affinities.
First, who contributes? Major donors tend to be board members rather than staffers. While many of the biggest contributors maintain relatively low public profiles, several are quite familiar. With outlays totaling $56,800, the most generous funder of politicians in IMIP's database is Kenny Gamble, who goes by Luqman Abdul Haqq in his position on MANA's governing body. An Islamist-aligned music and real estate mogul, Gamble is tied to the "Islamic paramilitary boys group" known as the Jawala Scouts and has been accused of working to build a self-contained "black Muslim enclave" in South Philadelphia. Also among the top 20 donors are CAIR executive director Nihad Awad, who has contributed under numerous variants of his name; former MAS president and current CAIR national board member Esam Omeish, who resigned from a Virginia immigration panel in 2007 after a video emerged of his speech touting the Palestinians' embrace of "the jihad way" against Israel; and Zead Ramadan, the CAIR-New York board member who unsuccessfully ran for New York City Council in 2013.
With regard to recipients, the Democratic Party dominates. Leading the all-time list by vacuuming up close to one in every five dollars is Keith Ellison, the Islamist-leaning Muslim congressman from Minnesota who has a long history of collaborating with Islamist groups. Barack Obama, whose policies have been popular with Islamists, comes in second when direct contributions are combined with those sent to joint fundraising committees associated with his 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns. Third is Cynthia McKinney, the far-left former congresswoman from Georgia who peddled conspiracy theories and harsh critiques of U.S. foreign policy in the wake of 9/11; that she ranks so high despite the fact that most donations to her were collected during a one-year, post-9/11 window testifies to Islamists' endorsement of her adversarial stance at the outset of America's military response to Islamic terrorism. Fourth is Indiana's André Carson, the second Muslim congressman to be elected; he told attendees at the 2012 ICNA–MAS convention that educators should model American schools after Islamic madrassas. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee rounds out the top five.
However, Democrats did not always prevail in the battle for Islamist cash. According to IMIP's current data, Republicans actually received about 15 percent more Islamist-related contributions than Democrats did over the several years prior to 9/11. The Islamists' favorite Republican of that period was Californian Tom Campbell, who contested a Senate seat in 2000. Campbell's warm relationships with radical Muslims, such as terror operative Sami al-Arian, are thoroughly documented. Further, although IMIP features only a handful of entries from the 2000 presidential race, there is more money for George W. Bush than for Al Gore. This is not a surprise because Bush won the backing of the American Muslim Political Coordination Committee, an Islamist-heavy coalition.
But 9/11 and the subsequent Republican-led war on terror changed everything, even the destination of Islamist money. IMIP detects the first hints of a sharp left turn in the form of donations to Cynthia McKinney from three Islamist figures, including Nihad Awad, on September 11, 2001 — undoubtedly before the Bush administration had a chance to do much to upset the self-proclaimed guardians of the Muslim community in the post-9/11 era. IMIP records no other contribution to any recipient within two weeks in either direction, making the date seem less coincidental. Many more donations would be routed to McKinney from Islamists' wallets in the months to come. Over the 365 days that followed the 9/11 attacks, IMIP measures an 8-to-1 ratio of contributions in the Democrats' favor. A majority of them flowed to McKinney.
This pro-Democratic tilt has continued to the present. Based on contributions now cataloged by IMIP, Democrats outraised Republicans by a factor of 4.8 from 2003 to 2006, 29.7 from 2007 to 2010, and 17.5 from 2011 to 2014. The two most recent blocks reflect the impact of Islamist enthusiasm for Obama's White House runs. As for the last three Republican presidential nominees, IMIP has located no contributions to Bush's 2004 campaign, none to John McCain's in 2008, and just one to Mitt Romney for $1,000 ahead of the 2012 primaries. Overall, the people in IMIP's sample have donated 12 times as much to Democrats since September 11, 2001.
Islamist-affiliated individuals presumably support Democrats for the same reason that other subsets of Americans throw their weight behind certain politicians and parties: they expect Democrats to support them, at least at the level of providing the best political landscape in which to pursue their objectives. But as Daniel Pipes points out, we are not dealing here with professionals attempting to "tweak the tax code" to their advantage or even a minority population striving to secure equal rights. Islamists intend to alter the fabric of the liberal democratic system, a goal characterized by the Muslim Brotherhood, in a memorandum outlining its North American strategy, as "a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within," culminating in Islamic rule.
Each of the six groups analyzed by IMIP is connected to the Brotherhood or its dream of institutionalizing Shari'a. ICNA, ISNA, and the Islamic Association for Palestine, CAIR's immediate predecessor, appear on the Brotherhood's 1991 "list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends." Both CAIR and ISNA were designated as unindicted co-conspirators in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation, a charity convicted of bankrolling Hamas, the Brotherhood's Palestinian wing. Prosecutors classified CAIR among the "individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood's Palestine Committee and/or its organizations"; they named ISNA as one of the "individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood." Furthermore, according to a brief filed by the government in a separate case, "MAS was founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America." Two Muslim Brothers also formed MPAC. Finally, MANA is helmed by radical cleric Siraj Wahhaj, who has spoken of replacing the Constitution with Islamic law.
Because the various board members and staffers researched by IMIP have participated in defining and executing the ideological agendas of the above groups, their campaign contributions are a matter of concern. This is not to suggest that the dollar amounts uncovered thus far — quite small by American standards — are tipping any elections. But even in modest quantities, money can purchase political access and open the doors of influence. When it comes to the agents of radical Islam, these doors must be barred shut.
No remotely mainstream politician would knowingly accept, let alone get away with accepting, contributions from a leader of a white supremacist organization. Why should it be any different for a leader of an Islamic supremacist organization? Those who represent the American people or seek to do so, especially in federal offices that oversee counterterrorism and foreign affairs, need to begin saying no to funds from these problematic sources. Islamist Money in Politics is a first step in nudging candidates and parties toward the right decision — and, where that fails, empowering voters to make informed choices of their own about politicians who wittingly or unwittingly legitimize, enable, or embolden America's enemies.

David J. Rusin is a research fellow at Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.

Young switching to GOP

 a new poll finds a majority of young Americans who intend to vote next week prefer a Republican-controlled Congress.
A survey released yesterday by Harvard Institute of Politics shows that of those age 18 to 29 who say they “definitely” will vote in the midterm elections Tuesday, 51 percent want Congress in GOP hands, compared to 47 percent who would rather have Democrats in charge.

Hillary

Hillary will try this phony war on women stuff too

Carly Fiorina: Female Voters Fed Up With Phony 'War on Women'

Wednesday, 29 Oct 2014 06:32 PM

By Bill Hoffmann

Close 

More ways to share...

• 0
  inShare

• The nation is fed up with the phony "war on women" that Democrats are endlessly accusing Republicans of waging, says Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard.

"We have a lot of data which suggests that people are tiring of the slogans and the gestures. Women, as well as men," Fiorina saud Wednesday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.

"There is more and more evidence that women are swinging over to the Republican side and partially it's because one of the top issues for women is jobs and the economy, national security, healthcare and education.

"Women and men are realizing that these gestures and these slogans are not serious and that we're living in serious times. People are undergoing serious issues and we need serious leadership."

Fiorina said women make up 50 percent of the nation's population and represent 53 percent of voters, making them capable of swaying elections.

women are the majority of voters . . . They care about every issue because they're worried about their own jobs, their husband's job and their children's future. They look at the headlines on Ebola and ISIS and they're worried about our nation's security," she said.

"On top of everything else, this war on women propaganda the Democrats have been throwing out there for the last couple of election cycles is insulting to women. Every issue is a women's issue."

Much of the rabble-rousing against Republicans is created by "professional activists" who seek to hijack political discourse, according to Fiorina.

"It's fine for people to disagree, these are complex issues. What's not fine is that complex issues get boiled down to simple slogans that are wrong," she said.

"We have people, for example, who push back against any reasonable discussion of what our policy should be around energy and climate change by lumping people into one of two categories: you're either a global warming denier or you're on the right side of truth and the American way.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Carly-Fiorina-women-voters-fed-up/2014/10/29/id/603987/#ixzz3HgXNtbDC
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Hillary Claiming Businesses Don’t Create Jobs

Big Three’ Sunday Shows Ignore Hillary Claiming Businesses Don’t Create Jobs

By Jeffrey Meyer | October 26, 2014 | 12:16 PM EDT

 

 

During a campaign rally for Martha Coakley, Democratic gubernatorial candidate in Massachusetts, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made some controversial comments about private businesses not being job creators.
Speaking on Friday, Clinton told a Democratic audience to ignore people who say “corporations and businesses create jobs.” Despite the potential 2016 presidential candidate expressing far left anti-business sentiments, all three network Sunday morning political shows (ABC’s This Week, CBS’s Face The Nation, and NBC’s Meet the Press) conveniently ignored Ms. Clinton’s remarks during their midterm coverage. 

- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2014/10/26/big-three-sunday-shows-ignore-hillary-claiming-businesses-dont-create#.VE2vBEfsK5Y.facebook



after 6 years of utter devastation by Obama and dem policies in action, and after a career of zero successes, after "what difference does it make" and now this idiocy, are there really 50.1% of American voters who would vote for her? Yes, maybe people on welfare, career Dems, stupid people might get her over the top. scary